B A model for risk group proportions

B.1 The Global AIDS Strategy

Table B.1: Prioritisation strata for AGYW given by UNAIDS (2021b) based on to HIV incidence in the general population and behavioural risk.
Prioritisation strata Criterion
Low 0.3-1.0% incidence and low-risk behaviour, or <0.3% incidence and high-risk behaviour
Moderate 1.0-3.0% incidence and low-risk behaviour, or 0.3-1.0% incidence and high-risk behaviour
High 1.0-3.0% incidence and high-risk behaviour
Very high >3.0% incidence
Table B.2: Commitments recommended by UNAIDS (2021b) to be met for each HIV intervention, given in terms of the proportion of the AGYW prioritisation strata reached. The symbol “-” represents no commitment.
Intervention Low Moderate High Very High
Condoms and lube for those with non-regular partners(s), unknown STI status, not on PrEP 50% 70% 95% 95%
STI screening and treatment 10% 10% 80% 80%
Access to PEP - - 50% 90%
PrEP use - 5% 50% 50%
Economic empowerment - - 20% 20%

B.2 Household survey data

Table B.3: The sample size by age group for each included survey in the analysis. The column “TS question” refers to whether or not the survey included a specific question about transactional sex (TS).
Type Year TS question Sample size
15-19 20-24 25-29 Total
Botswana
BAIS 2013 557 588 649 1794
Cameroon
DHS 2004 2678 2210 1732 6620
DHS 2011 3588 3115 2656 9359
PHIA 2017 2140 1923 1851 5914
DHS 2018 3349 2463 2345 8157
Kenya
DHS 2003 1819 1709 1391 4919
DHS 2008 1767 1743 1420 4930
DHS 2014 2861 2534 2858 8253
Lesotho
DHS 2004 1761 1456 1026 4243
DHS 2009 1834 1545 1195 4574
DHS 2014 1537 1293 1069 3899
PHIA 2017 1156 1202 1054 3412
Mozambique
AIS 2009 1031 1106 987 3124
DHS 2011 3065 2468 2340 7873
AIS 2015 1554 1390 1080 4024
Malawi
DHS 2000 2914 2998 2358 8270
DHS 2004 2407 2823 2135 7365
DHS 2010 5032 4387 4309 13728
DHS 2015 5273 5094 3976 14343
PHIA 2016 1646 1934 1511 5091
Namibia
DHS 2000 1428 1313 1099 3840
DHS 2006 2203 1870 1544 5617
DHS 2013 1852 1709 1482 5043
PHIA 2017 1491 1525 1370 4386
Eswatini
DHS 2006 1265 1027 731 3023
PHIA 2017 1031 895 811 2737
Tanzania
AIS 2003 1466 1377 1270 4113
AIS 2007 2137 1676 1509 5322
DHS 2010 2221 1860 1613 5694
AIS 2012 2474 1923 1815 6212
Uganda
DHS 2000 1687 1541 1326 4554
DHS 2006 1948 1661 1406 5015
AIS 2011 2451 2164 1921 6536
DHS 2011 2025 1664 1614 5303
DHS 2016 4276 3782 3014 11072
PHIA 2016 3289 3059 2574 8922
South Africa
DHS 2016 1505 1408 1397 4310
Zambia
DHS 2007 1598 1405 1373 4376
DHS 2013 3685 3036 2789 9510
PHIA 2016 2120 2045 1619 5784
DHS 2018 3112 2687 2166 7965
Zimbabwe
DHS 1999 1468 1230 1011 3709
DHS 2005 2128 1943 1438 5509
DHS 2010 1966 1796 1680 5442
DHS 2015 2154 1779 1647 5580
PHIA 2016 2114 1817 1573 5504
Total


103063 92173 79734 274970
Table B.4: All of that household surveys that were excluded from the risk group model in Section 5.3.
Survey Reason for exclusion
Mozambique 2003 DHS No GPS coordinates available to place survey clusters within districts.
Tanzania 2015 DHS Insufficient sexual behaviour questions.
Uganda 2004 AIS Unable to download region boundaries.
Zambia 2002 DHS No GPS coordinates available to place survey clusters within districts.

B.3 Spatial analysis levels

Table B.5: The number of areas and analysis level for each country that was used in the analysis.
Country Number of areas Analysis level
Botswana 27 Health district
Cameroon 58 Department
Kenya 47 County
Lesotho 10 District
Mozambique 161 District
Malawi 33 Health district and cities
Namibia 38 District
Eswatini 4 Region
Tanzania 195 District
Uganda 136 District
South Africa 52 District
Zambia 116 District
Zimbabwe 63 District

B.4 Survey questions and risk group allocation

Table B.6: The behavioural survey questions included in AIDS Indicator Survey (AIS) and Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) used to determine AGYW risk group membership.
Variable(s) Description
\(\texttt{v501}\) Current marital status of the respondent.
\(\texttt{v529}\) Computed time since last sexual intercourse.
\(\texttt{v531}\) Age at first sexual intercourse–imputed.
\(\texttt{v766b}\) Number of sexual partners during the last 12 months (including husband).
\(\texttt{v767[a, b, c]}\) Relationship with last three sexual partners. Options are: spouse, boyfriend not living with respondent, other friend, casual acquaintance, relative, commercial sex worker, live-in partner, other.
\(\texttt{v791a}\) Had sex in return for gifts, cash or anything else in the past 12 months. (Asked only to women 15-24 who are not in a union.)
Table B.7: The behavioural survey questions included in Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment (PHIA) surveys used to determine AGYW risk group membership.
Variable(s) Description
\(\texttt{part12monum}\) Number of sexual partners during the last 12 months (including husband).
\(\texttt{part12modkr}\) Reason for leaving blank.
\(\texttt{partlivew[1, 2, 3]}\) Does the person you had sex with live in this household?
\(\texttt{partrelation[1, 2, 3]}\) Relationship with last three sexual partners. Options are: husband, live-in partner, partner (not living with), ex-spouse/partner, friend/acquaintance, sex worker, sex worker client, stranger, other, don’t know, refused.
\(\texttt{sellsx12mo}\) Had sex for money and/or gifts in the last 12 months.
\(\texttt{buysx12mo}\) Paid money or given gifts for sex in the last 12 months.

B.5 Additional figures

The proportion of posterior variance explained by each random effect, calculated as a ratio of the random effect variance posterior mean to the sum of all random effect variance posterior means. To allow calculation of this metric by country, the model was run for each country individually.

Figure B.1: The proportion of posterior variance explained by each random effect, calculated as a ratio of the random effect variance posterior mean to the sum of all random effect variance posterior means. To allow calculation of this metric by country, the model was run for each country individually.

For the 20-24 and 25-29 age groups, the proportion of AGYW in the one cohabiting partner and non-regular or multiple partner(s) risk groups was bimodal.

Figure B.2: For the 20-24 and 25-29 age groups, the proportion of AGYW in the one cohabiting partner and non-regular or multiple partner(s) risk groups was bimodal.

References

UNAIDS. 2021b. Global AIDS strategy 2021–2026. End inequalities. End AIDS.”